Therefore, the enactment of a material and adverse change to a buildings smoking policy, or the adoption of a new smoking policy pursuant to Local Law 147 where there was no previously disclosed written smoking policy, may trigger a right of rescission for any contract vendee who executed a purchase agreement prior to August 29, 2018 if such purchase agreement remains executory and the contract vendee did not receive written notice of the buildings smoking policy prior to executing the purchase agreement
Its definitely not normal, and it might not even be moral, but if Juul can get past regulatory concerns, theres actually a great business hiding under all of the red tape
While a regular smoker ingests nicotine and tar only from the cigarettes he/she uses, those in the vicinity of these regulars end up being subjected to a larger amount of these 6 due to the density of suspended particles in the air (which are smaller in side-stream smoke and hence stay airborne longer) from multiple smokers, which adds to the existing pollution in the air
Julie McCluskie, both state sponsors for the legislation, declined to comment for the same reason
